Saturday, February 16, 2013

Selfcontrol, Sports and American Culture


Any society functions on certain values and understandings whether true values or not. Over time, those societal values will start to bring fruits; things will come to a head. That is then the time when we need to move toward self-examination within society. If we refuse to do that and just want to engage in quick fixes, the problems will accelerate, and societies will self-destruct.  Any historian could give you examples of societies who fell by their own hand.

TV coverage of Sports shows us the cultural differences between America and other countries. Of course, different cultures do things differently. It also shows if we carefully examine the differences, how our culture progresses as well as where it might fall short. For example, in the Wimbledon tennis, the BBC commentators (British) speak as little as possible during points and save their observations for the changeovers. On the other hand, Geoff Mason, producer for NBC, called the British telecasts 'a little bit sterile for our audience.’ American culture calls for focus on emotion, being super aggressive, and getting closer to the action. Reserve and respect are not our way of doing it.[1]  Respect does not seem to be a virtue in our country.  A reporter, a public figure, presumed to be speaking out for the majority, will influence young people negatively.

            There is the misleading idea that competition in all possible fields will diminish the kind of hostility, which leads to war. However, there is the alternate view presented within individual research.  “Anthropologist Richard Sipes selected a random sample of cultures around the world and rated them for the frequency of their wars and the presence or absence of combative sports. (sports that involve body contact, the real or symbolic gaining of territory, and any warlike action)...” the out come was…, that societies that encourage violence in their sports are those that have the most wars.”[2]  In addition, if fans learn behavior from players then we are teaching, amongst other things, our children and youth behavior we have no business teaching them.

            In an article on aggression and violence in sports, I found following: “Sports are based on motivation theories since the core of athletic competition is linked to the human compulsion towards excellence and superiority. Thus, it seems logical to accept that sports are based on human motives (e.g. Compulsion to win), which if not adequately fulfilled, can elicit extreme behavioral patterns (e.g. Violent acts), which in turn are the byproduct of repressed aggression.”[3] This explanation makes it clear that sports are not helping prevent wars.  Besides when it comes to the human compulsion toward excellence and superiority, can they ever be fulfilled? If we succeed, we want more and more of it. In one of my other blog entries, I investigated the notion of superiority as well as how it violates everything that is human love. Would it not make sense that training children to be aggressive in their sports expands to all areas of their lives? Is it then a wonder that our children are acting out; engaging in violent behavior? The interesting thing is that not only the players but also the fans are more hostile after a game, even if their team won. In Oklahoma, the Thunder games have produced a ban because of the violence caused by fans that not only were exhilarated at the win, but also seemed to want to totally extinguish the opposing fan base through physical attacks on persons and properties.

            Aggressiveness by definition is ‘being out of control,’ hence, a cultural and learned response. Often fans are not entertained unless there is a presence of aggressive behavior of their sport heroes (especially in Football, Wrestling, etc.). Hence, the heroes are encouraged and often go un-penalized. If such behavior on the other hand was penalized it would bring back balance and perhaps put it to a stop, but who would want to stop it?

            The question becomes, as much as sports promote fitness, are all sports good for us with present day guidelines and rules that allow for lack of respect, honor, or even balance within the institutions that govern them? If aggressive sports have such a negative impact, the conclusion would be NO! Non-aggressive sports are rarely given the same airtime during Olympic coverage; I believe they are not emotionally stimulating enough for the American audience. Look at the research and the statement made.  Tavris, points out “when the Cowboys lose a football game, the crime rate in Dallas goes up...Professional athletes in combative sports become more, not less, aggressive and hostile as their season progresses, and during the off-season they are more hostile than non-combative athletes and non-athletes.”[4]   I believe it is our tolerance (and since we consider it entertainment, our enjoyment) to aggression, that invites out-of-control behavior.  Anything we choose to tolerate, become desensitized to, or find excuses to remain unchanged, will continue.  Moreover, anything we choose to refuse to tolerate affects change, or will stop due to having consequences. There is a need to show that aggressive behavior is not OK.

Another problem is that we adore individuals instead of just enjoying the sport. The statement made by Tarvis supports this; “The purpose of sporting rules, like the purpose of manner, is to force us to put the game ahead of the individual.  Yet by and large, we are a nation that celebrates the individual over the team, the emotion over its control, the rule-breaking over the rule, competition over cooperation. These values are apparent in the sports we most enjoy and the players we pay most highly.”[5] We encourage rule breaking by paying players who show violent displays, highly.  If anyone in any other social setting would be displaying the same behavior, the consequences would be ‘go to jail.’ Not only do we encourage rule breaking, we have created injustice.

It is not that sports is the only piece in the puzzle of our increasing violence amongst children and youth, but it IS an important piece nonetheless. The ultimate question is not ‘can we learn self control,’ the question is, ‘do we want to learn self control.’  It is a well-known fact that if we come to understand early enough that self-control is essential to a functioning society, change is affected.  Therefore, one individual at a time must make this choice before our country comes apart. Will we as individuals, and as a community, be willing to make some of the sacrifices for a better future? This should not be taken as a suggestion to stop playing sports; the time has come when we need to move toward self-examination within society. It is time to look at those societal values and their fruits. Must is a word that is pivotal to making change in our attitude toward them, or at least the behaviors that have become so prominent surrounding them. 


           

Self control exercises


Sit quietly for a moment and breathe. Try not to think of anything, just breathe. Soon you will notice that your thoughts have their own conversations going on. Notice what is being said there, and then let it go. Again, try to empty your mind. Keep on doing that for a while. What have you learned?

Are those thoughts saying hateful things, self-demeaning things? Often they do! Once you notice what those random thoughts say and repeat, cut those thoughts off and instead choose purposely a thought that counteracts the negative narrative. That cannot be done overnight, but with practice you should notice the thoughts and emotions that are hidden.


[1]    Carol Tavris, Anger the Misunderstood Emotion, (..........), 191.
[2]    Carol Tavris, Anger the Misunderstood Emotion, (..........), 183-184.
[4]    Carol Tavris, Anger the Misunderstood Emotion, (..........), 184
[5]    Carol Tavris, Anger the Misunderstood Emotion, (..........), 190-191

© 2013 Angelika Mitchell

No comments:

Post a Comment