Saturday, January 19, 2013

Self-control is Gun control


We are deep in discussions about gun violence; whether guns should be restricted or not. Small groups, large groups, national meetings all have this subject on the agenda. First, I would like to call to mind an interview between Pierce Morgan and Alex, (the man who called for Pierce's deportation because he promoted getting rid of guns). The interview was very enlightening. Pierce tried to ask a simple question but was never able to finish his question. Alex immediately began spouting his own rage at even the thought of taking away his/our guns. His confrontative behavior lasted throughout the interview. The body language Alex exhibited was even more revealing. There was anger, also terror, in this man's behavior. The subject of government oppression seemed to be the source he attached his anger. Which government was he talking about, and was he oppressed or abused somehow in his childhood in some form or another? It certainly would be interesting to research. Because it showed a person out of control dominated by fear and anger who wants his guns; should someone like that really have guns? Obviously hidden behind this debate is fear and anger. Anger at the way things are going economically, in how much people have to struggle and a dozen other things. People are obviously in need of hope!

St. Augustine's quote: “Anger and courage are hope's two beautiful daughters,”1 inspired me to research anger further. People everywhere get angry at some time or another. “Anger usually involves a conscious judgment that an injustice, an insult, or idiocy has been committed, and a choice of reaction.”2 The author, Carol Tavris writes, “anger and violent action do not necessarily co-exist. You may feel angry and express it in hundreds of ways, many of which will be neutral or even beneficial. (from scrubbing the house, playing the piano forte, organizing a political protest movement”.3 As the author describes the expression of anger in various cultures, it seems, most veer on the side of self control. Some cultures will ostracize a person for being temporarily insane if they express uncontrolled rage. Psychotherapy in the Western world has for decades encouraged the venting of anger, claiming that bottled up anger is harmful. The author describes therapists who admonish their clients to stop being nice. When they let their anger right out, they will not overeat, or over drink or end up sick, that is the claim. Another therapist tells his clients “to put themselves first...for the sake of owning up to who they really are.”4 The problem with that is, what if the person in therapy is a wife beater? Tavris makes the point that “People get angry in the service of their culture's rules. Whenever we are angry, we somehow believe that we can influence the object of our anger.”5 Violence is a choice used when we try to get it our way!

Violence is a taught choice in the world. “We don't have to take all the garbage,” that is a learned attitude. Even though we should not have to, there are times we might have to take some of the garbage. For that, we need self-control. Not only is this form of therapy namely expressing anger through punching, yelling and throwing things not teaching self control, but our whole society is thriving on lack of control. Instant gratification is a big business. “Psychotherapy, of course, takes place within a culture and is deeply embedded in cultural rules.”6

Since there are obviously a wide variety of ways to express our anger, getting angry and expressing it with a gun is not an optimal and acceptable choice and causes in not only the perpetrators but also the victims lives regrettable changes. At the same time as we are encouraging lack of self control, we also depress the arts in schools and in our culture at large. A combination of all this, including a tumbling economy, not enough jobs and great frustration with the way things are going, brings emotions to a boiling point. There has been proof that people who can express themselves artistically will be able to not only funnel their anger creatively7, we just might see through those paintings, drawings and writings the stored up anger coming to a head and we might be able with the help of the arts to prevent occurrences like Columbine, Co; or Sandy Hook, Con. Amongst other things, we need to teach self-control in schools. We finally are coming up with a non-bullying curriculum, at least in some schools. However, that needs to go further. We cannot tell kids they cannot do something, we need to teach them how to control their impulses. Self-control does not come automatically. I see a great hope in the arts and a new curriculum.

For example, Gregg Furth who has investigated drawing as a viable aid to counseling writes: “A picture or drawing always communicates a feeling.”8 He examines pictures and their possible interpretations and hidden messages. Those messages are often unconscious. Furth was looking at a drawing by Lowry, at age eighty-nine. Lowry was a renowned British artist, yet even he managed to imbed a message in his “professional” drawing. His picture shows a man with the coat turning inward in the heart area (which goes against gravity). It turns out the author died of heart failure a few months later.

I wonder if trained therapists might very well have been able to prevent the horrific acts of Columbine and Sandy Hook ahead of time. The problem is we would need trained therapists, trained in deciphering the arts and employ them in the service of schools and society. Art-therapy in general seems to be a side kick of the therapies and not very well understood. The arts can empower people enormously; they give people a voice where they feel they have none. If we take that voice away, they have to find it somehow else. In addition, it looks like the other voice is the gun barrel in the face. The arts could certainly serve as a preventative tool and be an important aide in self control.

Only if we teach self-control and give people ways to express their anger creatively can we in good conscience allow guns in people's hands, otherwise such freedom is too dangerous, because currently this society seems to believe in freedom without responsibility. The appropriate response to anger can truly bring hope. If we create a new and necessary thing to prevent injustice, our response can be fruitful and hope giving not only to us but also to many others. Any misguided person can express violence. It takes courage to express anger productively.

2Carol Tavris, Anger: The Misunderstood Emotion, (New York, 1989), 37.
3Carol Tavris, Anger: The Misunderstood Emotion, (New York, 1989), 37.
4Carol Tavris, Anger: The Misunderstood Emotion, (New York, 1989), 42.
5Carol Tavris, Anger: The Misunderstood Emotion, (New York, 1989), 49.
6Carol Tavris, Anger: The Misunderstood Emotion, (New York, 1989), 67
8Gregg M. Furth, The Secret World of Drawings; Healing Through Art, (Bosotn: Sigo Press, 1988), 37.


© 2013 Angelika Mitchell

No comments:

Post a Comment